Why We Are Kinder to Other People Than We Are to Ourselves

“Why do we offer other people an understanding that we so often deny ourselves?”

Imagine someone you care about tells you they have made a mistake. Perhaps they handled a situation badly, missed an opportunity, failed at something important to them, or simply did something they wish they could undo. Most of us would instinctively search for context. We would remind them that one mistake does not define them, that they were doing what they could with what they knew at the time, or that being imperfect is hardly unusual.

Then imagine the mistake was ours - The language can change remarkably quickly.

What was understandable in someone else becomes inexcusable in ourselves. Context begins to sound like an excuse. A poor decision becomes evidence of poor judgement more generally. We replay what happened, sometimes long after anyone else has stopped thinking about it, searching for the point at which we should have known better.

There is an odd assumption beneath this. Many of us appear to believe that being hard on ourselves is somehow useful. Self-criticism can feel like accountability. If we remain sufficiently disappointed in ourselves, perhaps we will not repeat the mistake. If we allow ourselves understanding too quickly, perhaps we are letting ourselves off the hook.

Psychology suggests that the relationship is not so straightforward. Self-criticism is increasingly understood as a process that cuts across a range of psychological difficulties rather than belonging to any single diagnosis. Research into self-compassion has also challenged the idea that treating ourselves less harshly simply encourages complacency. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials found that self-compassion-based interventions produced a meaningful reduction in self-criticism, although the researchers appropriately noted limitations in the quality and heterogeneity of the available studies.

Perhaps part of the difficulty is that we experience ourselves from the inside.

With other people, we see a whole person making a mistake. With ourselves, we experience the embarrassment, disappointment and internal commentary simultaneously. We know every hesitation that preceded the decision and every alternative we failed to take. We have access to evidence against ourselves that nobody else possesses. We also know our own history.

A small mistake can therefore attach itself to something much larger. Being overlooked for a promotion may awaken an old belief that we are not capable enough. Saying the wrong thing in a conversation can become evidence that we always ruin things. A relationship ending can quietly transform from this relationship did not work into there is something about me that people cannot stay with. The event ends. The judgement expands.

Self-criticism can also masquerade as ambition. We tell ourselves that high standards are what keep us moving, and sometimes they do. There is value in recognising our shortcomings, taking responsibility and wanting to improve. But accountability and hostility are not synonyms. It is possible to acknowledge that we got something wrong without turning the mistake into a verdict on who we are.

We understand this instinctively when dealing with people we care about. Compassion does not require us to lie to them. We can tell a friend that they behaved badly while still believing they are fundamentally decent. We can encourage someone to do better without suggesting that their worth depends upon doing so. Somehow, when the conversation turns inward, that nuance becomes more difficult to maintain. Perhaps this is because self-kindness feels undeserved precisely when it is most needed.

It is easy to be patient with ourselves when everything is going well. The real test arrives when we are ashamed, disappointed, frightened or uncertain. Those are the moments when the internal voice often becomes least forgiving, as though suffering should be accompanied by punishment.

There is another possibility; we could speak to ourselves with the same combination of honesty and proportion that we offer someone else. Not pretending something did not matter, but refusing to make it mean more than it does. Not avoiding responsibility, but recognising that responsibility becomes more useful when it leads somewhere other than shame.

This is not simply sentimental advice. Meta-analytic evidence suggests interventions focused on self-compassion can reduce self-criticism, stress, anxiety and depressive symptoms, although, as with any psychological approach, the evidence has limitations and effects vary between people and studies. The broader point is perhaps simpler: cruelty towards ourselves is not a prerequisite for growth.

Most of us will spend decades living with the same internal voice. It will accompany achievements that nobody else witnesses, mistakes that everyone else forgets, ordinary mornings, terrible evenings, beginnings, endings, and all the uncertain periods between them.

It seems worth paying attention to how that voice speaks. Not because we should always approve of ourselves, or because every decision deserves reassurance, but because there is something strange about offering patience so freely to the people we love while believing we must become worthy of receiving the same from ourselves.

Perhaps the question is not whether we deserve to be kinder to ourselves.

Perhaps it is why we ever decided kindness had to be deserved.

Next
Next

Being Human. The Weight of Expectations